Employee Involvement Case Essay

For the fact 1 the scribble substitute research ending, I result choose exalted affair, which is let the subordinates to discuss the problems and identify a solution. So the entire end-making process is handed over to employees, identify the problems, choose the trounce manipulatenative and implement their choice. For the back case coast guard ships boat decision problem, I go away choose the low affaire, which is look one or more subordinates foe education relating to the problem, just you go intot ask for their recommendations and might not mention the problem to them. So they siret run recommendations and only participation involves is asking employees for information. p get ating question 2The first factor led me to choose advanced involvement is the decision structure this problem is not programmed decision but a little bit mazyity and more opportunity. This product consider to feature some ascendant away from other projects in lay out to required some era and resources before it would be commercially stage. Second, source of decision association could show that the attraction lack sufficient knowledge and subordinates have addition information to improve decision quality. I fag outt know such(prenominal) about demand is expected and the sugar substitute project beyond my technical expertise. However, the R&D laboratory researchers are familiar with that field of chemistry. Third, the decision commitment is trended to improve if spunky level of involvement to her decision. If the employees are un liable(predicate) to accept a decision made without their involvement, some level of involvement should be used. For this case, the company R&D budget is limited and other scientist in my group has of late complained that they require more resources and financial support to get their projects completed. So the employees complaints get down me chose high involvement.Also, the employees committed make me believe that they have pr omise to reckon the companys interest are achieved so that I should march on them more involvement to ensure the project could be finished without conflict. For the second case, the first factor led me to choose low involvement is that this is likely programmd decisions which are followstandard operating procedures and they have been resolved in past. So there is little needs for high involvement that whitethorn waste of time under this necessary and stake situation. Second, the leader has much knowledge to solve this problem which whitethorn occur in the past, and as the captain, I totally understand the mission and the goal for the mission. So that may need less recommendation from other employees who lack of experiences and abilities.However, the low involvement not no involvement, so I received an update die hard advisory concerning the severity and duration of the storm, which is important to making decision. Moreover, the decision essential be made shortly by facing a locoweed of risk of exposures. So if take long time to make high involvement may lead to unnecessary dangers. Third, the factor of risk of conflict is weigh on the situation between the employee goals and norms conflict with the organizations goals, and this would be take low involvement. Also, if there is low conflict that the employees will reach agreement on the preferred solution, then take low involvement. For this case, my pack members are extremely conscientious about their responsibility, so I dont need to take additional time to take high involvement under this low conflict with the preferred solutions.Discussion Question 3To the first case, if take low involvement may take longer time to solve this problem due to the fact that the leader has less knowledge about this technology of projects. Less involvement will not help to improve the number and quality of solutions generated. This case is complex so that need to prepare several alternatives with more available informa tion which the employees who has more knowledge are bang-up to support. Also, with the diverse perspectives and boarder archetype of value may help to improve the likelihood of choosing the best alter nativities. Besides, these projects are group work in this organization, providing more involvement is good to make staff fell personally responsible for its success. However, the low involvement may lead to lower turnover, motivation and satisfaction.Moreover, if the leader uses low involvement, there is many more compliant and most likely to resist changes resulting from the decision by leader alone. To the second case, the higher involvement was taken, the higher risk could occur during the decision making. The reason is that the research hasbeen doing for 20 hours and the wear are more likely to affect the lives in the vessel. So taking time longer to do involvement are defiantly dangers. Also, the captain mustiness be the one who has valuable experiences and ability to make t he most ideal decision. So taking long time to doing high involvement could make the whole team lost of control.After all, everybody has different attitude and value that may have conflicts with the mission and the whole organization when they face the risk situation. Furthermore, too low involvement or no involvement may also make wrong decision, so the necessary information from weather advisory concerning are useful for helping the captain decrease the defect when making the decision in the short time.