Anthropology

ANTH100 Assignment 1 Heather Hartwig American Military University October 21, 2012 Assignment 1 1) wrangle what organic development is in harm of visible anthropology. Evolution refers to change eachwhere time. In m integritytary value of physical anthropology, evolution is changes e reallyplace time in living organisms. This heart that living things bring passed their traits from one generation to the succeeding(prenominal). There atomic number 18 very little changes that occur with to each one generation, provided over time these changes stash in each living organism.It is thinkd that all life on terra firma has jet ancestry that lived more than 3. 5 billions of years ago (Park, 2008). 2) countersink evolution. Evolution is defined as the idea or scientific scheme that was proposed by Charles Darwin. Darwin believed that all species changed and evolved by natural selection from the uniform common ancestors. Evolution simply instrument that a species undergo es genetic change over time. Over m each generations a species can evolve into something divergent. These changes take mystify beca subroutine of changes in DNA, which originated as mutations.Not all species evolve at the kindred rate. The supposition of evolution does non prove that species will constantly evolve or how fast the species will change when it does (Park, 2008). 3) Discuss what a physical anthropologist may examine/investigate in assure to champaign evolution. Paleoanthropology is a branch of paleontology that falls under physical anthropology. Paleoanthropologists guide divulge(p) archpriests and fossils. They use these examinations to further investigate the evolution of hu spellkinds.They examine antediluvian world, like the anthropoids. Anthropoids are considered humans closest relative and have been coupled to human evolution (Coyne, 2009). 4) Discuss how a physical anthropologist would study your perform for Q3 and why it is helpful for studying evolution. Paleoanthropologists are able to study evolution by examining fossils and ancient humans. They do this by examine the fossil take and continue to make additions all the time. The early identifiable multicellular organism formed closely 585 million years ago.The earliest fossil of the primate can go back forwards the extinction of the dinosaur over 65 million years ago. Bones and teeth were discovered in tonne and Wyoming (Park, 2008). Even though there was primate like evidence before the dinosaur extinction, (Shipman, 2012). 5) Find at least one foreign source link to your answer for Q3 and Q4 (e. g. the genome project for DNA- do not use this example in your paper since it is provided for you). My outside source for questions 3 and 4 is a diary by Pat Shipman titled Fossils.This journal was published in The new-sprung(prenominal) Scientist Vol. 215, bulge 2876, p. 8-16. 6) Briefly describe the source and how is it helpful for examining/investigating evoluti on. It is a journal that discusses fossils of early life and evolution. It tumbles incidents and suss outing pertaining to the timelines, type and the formation of fossils. 7) submit a punt subfield of anthropology cultural, linguistic, or archaeology. I chose archeology as my second subfield of anthropology. 8) Discuss how an anthropologist in this subfield would study evolution.Park defines archaeology as a subfield of anthropology that studies the bygone culture of humans and reconstructs the past cultural systems that existed. He goes on to assert that they study cultures and the great unwashed that are no longer living (Park, 2008). Archaeology reconstructs past cultural systems. Archaeology began as a method of identifying places and objects that were already kn aver from historical records. It has become a very resourceful means of discovering new information not only or so the historical breaker point but as well as rough years beyond the reach of write investi gational facts.The purpose of archaeology is not only to recover ancient artifacts but to identify the relationship that these objects may have had with early human life. It in any case generates how early human primates and modern humans are well-nigh re latterlyd. 9) Discuss what an anthropologist from your chosen subfield may examine/investigate in order to study evolution. Archaeologists have investigated fossils and stay of early humans and primates to extract how human posture has changed over the years.The information that has been collected shows us a timeline of how oft we have evolved since the discovery of the earliest human remains (Park, 2008). 10) Discuss how an anthropologist from your chosen subfield would study your answer for Q9, and why it is helpful for studying evolution. Archaeologists have reconstructed human and primate remains that they have discovered to show how closely we are related to each other. They have used the information that they discovere d to prove that humans have evolved from and can be compared to the primate species.Compared to earlier species, modern humans have evolved into a more equitable species. Early humans were found to have a more curving posture (Palmer, 2010). The archaeological information that is recorded proves that there is another story for our species other than what is believed by many. The Bible teaches that we were created by God. However, archaeologists make a ardent case that contradicts what the Bible teaches. 11) Find at least one outside source related to your answer for Q9 and Q10. My source for questions 9 and 10 is Origins humankind Evolution Revealed by Douglas Palmer. 2) Briefly describe the source and how is it helpful for examining/investigating evolutionThis book goes into detail on the story of the origins of the human species. It goes into detail slightly the journey of apes and humans. It compares and contrasts the differences as well as the similarities between early hu man species and the modern human species. 13) Discuss how the study of evolution between physical anthropology and your chosen subfield compare and contrast. Paleoanthropology and archaeology go hand in hand, because they both study fossils, extinct primates and the remains of early humans.They slackly work together when investigating a site where artifacts have been discovered. The team work and information that is provided between paleoanthropology and archaeology gives us a better understanding of how humans have evolved into the modern species that we are today. 14) discontinue by discussing one new piece of information you learned a daily round evolution. The one piece of information that I have learned about evolution is that I cannot solely base my understanding of how the human species became base off of my teachings from the Bible.I understand now that scientific research has given existent information on how humans can and have evolved from ancient remains of primates and early humans. I will maintain that I believe that God did create us to an extent. However, I think that his creations have proceed to evolve into the species that are here on earth today.References Palmer, Douglas. 2010. Origins human evolution revealed. Octopus Books, USA. New York, NY. Park, Michael A. 2008. Introducing anthropology an integrated approach. Fourth edition. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY. Shipman, Pat. 2012. Fossils. The new scientist. Vol. 215, Issue 2876, p. 8-16.AnthropologyAnthropology is the scientific study of humans as social organisms and how they interact with each other in a social gathering or companionship set up. It entails the study of humans past, present and evolution of the cultural, physical stature, linguistic traits and archaeology. An anthropologist interest lies in comprehending human miscellanea and way of life in an explicit manner. The four main branches of anthropology which include biological, cultural, archaeology and linguistic clea r elaborate what it entails to be human (Lavenda-2013).Biological anthropology talks of how the evolution of humans is genetically influenced and not enhanced by the surroundings. Cultural anthropology is centered on the study of structural system of respective(prenominal)s sharing a common belief or norm. Linguistic anthropology majorly revolves round the psychology of s buildch, structure and function in humans. Lastly, archaeology is found on the systematic revealing of fossils through excavation, dating the fossils to determine the period of usage and analysis.Anthropology mainly beguileks to familiarize the unfamiliar with proven facts and provide recognizeledge that deciphers facts from fiction.Cultural anthropology is a very enticing concept of anthropology because it does not only enable one to accept and appreciate cultural diversity but also develop globally conscious individuals. As mentioned earlier, this medical prognosis of anthropology explicitly studies human cu ltures, belief, daily routine, values, ideas, technical economies and domains of social and cognitive musical arrangement (Lavenda-2010).There are two means by which an anthropologist can study culture due to its abstract nature empiricist approach, whereby he mainly relies on observation of the human behavior in a particular community set-up and subjective approach in which the researcher understands the structure of ideas and meanings that exist in a member a certain culture. The uncreated perception that I ad hominemly had about humanity has been scraped off as a pass of the in-depth study of cultural anthropology.Individuals and communities were initially characterized by their social, economical and political factors in spite of appearance their localities. Evolutionism has showed a conceptual comprise due to the easy interaction of individuals as a result of the modern evolution of technology that has made every corner of the world accessible to any person. The level of i nteractions between individuals from a similar ecology niche has almost become non-existence due to the replacing with television programs, movies and social electronic devices.Despite this, the social interaction pass on has grown larger as a result of technology which enables an individual interact with more people different from parts of the world over a short period of time. This study has personally helped me get over the judgement that Muslims are associated with terrorism. I initially felt fear when I was in an environment filled with Muslims well, not Muslims alone but any individual snaping a veil.This mostly applied to Muslim women that wear the veils covering up their faces, leaving out the eyes. I can associate this fear from to the society I grew in I was used to my Christian community before I came to campus. The laws and beliefs we had were so strict that we feared other dominions, this loneliness was driven into us by the clergy to make us believe that people t hat had different beliefs and practices were potential risks and could harm us at any time. The autochthonic notion that was instilled in me always had a bearing to this question if they are good people, why do they find it relevant to cover their faces that much? The definite answer was that they had something to hide not only secrets but threatening motives.Religious profiling and the threats that came to our country and get aired on guinea pig television also cultivated the fear in me. It would have never reached this point if my parents would not have been reacting to the issue with so much annoyance as they used to do. My elementary and superior school environments were more or less the same because all my schooling up to university level were based in the same strictly Christian district.There were some primitive practices we used to do that I now see them to have been very hurting if not shameful to the face of evolution and humanity at large there was no shaking of hand s or exchanging pleasantries with non-Christians, no accepting gifts from them and worst still, avoid all conversations. I cant imagine that I would literally snob them I essential admit that I had a tough time adjusting to the campus environment.I was always tensed in my first semesters when a non Christian would sit next t me. I take to be a particular case when I came to a lecture late and found all seats occupied except one next to Sikh, I literally missed that 2 hour lecture and had to deal with my continuous assessment test. It is during that course that I made a bit point and my point was later boosted when I got to learn about anthropology. The sputter I had in my first continuous assessment test was the same one I had in the second.Ironically, the Sikh boy who I was evading was the same one that noticed my problem and came to help. At first I was rhomb but with lack of options I thought why not give it a try. I must admit that that is the sweetest memory I defy dear and use it to enlighten my rural folk later on. With that act of compassion I learnt that religion does or dress code does not define someones character. Study of anthropology has helped know the value that I hold about my culture and the justifications I give to the are the same ones that any other person would give in support to their religion and culture.It also taught me that perspicacity or profiling others because f ethnicity and background is a heinous notion if everyone was to discriminate then the world would be an unbearable place to stay. all told we could be witnessing are endless fights and ultimate wars. Cultural anthropology thus, aims at enabling the native of a particular culture objectively and rationally understands their own culture to deduce what makes them stand out from the other cultural groups therefore upholding the aspect of self acceptance.Besides, it enables one apply the knowledge gained from familiarizing with different cultures to alleviate human challenges and misconceptions rather than causing ethnic conflicts. The collective study of different cultures enables scholars to identify the similarities and unique aspect of various cultures, hence comprehend diversity.ReferencesRobert H LavendaCore concept in cultural anthropologyRobert H LavendaAnthropology What does it mean to be human?AnthropologyFrom ruttier to rummies A Contribution toward the Ethnography of Peeling. In Cultural Anthropology A Sampler. Up. 19-22. 2. Elliot Rolling objectives for the article were to happen upon priapic urinating behaviors In universal restrooms. I believe he did meet his objectives because he was able to observe them Pee. 3. As stated before, the method that Rings used to research his effect was to observe males urinate. I feel Like watching people pee could make people uncomfortable, mad, or genuinely elate their privacy.Although, the only way to actually understand the culture behind males urinating is to actually observe their beh aviors so I think that his method was inappropriate but necessary. 4. The authors findings started off not in the bathroom, but actually led up to why a male goes into the bathroom. While in a social group, one must remove themselves from the group by some sort of excuse or dictation like saying, l have to go to the bathroom. He further discusses that bathrooms could also be used as a social setting.For example, in high school hanging UT in the hall ways was not allowed, yet if students met up in the bathrooms, they could hangout and talk without the disturbance of a teacher. Going on, he discovers that peeing is the activity primarily intended by Males. He discovers that men prefer to have there own personal space of one urinal to the left and right. This becomes violated when one another know each other. Another key fact that Rings realizes is that during the act of peeing, one must enumerate forward and keep theyre eyes to themselves.If one was to look at another man, this mi ght invite the suspicion of nonsexual interest. Also, he notices the shaking of the penis to get the last drops out, even though no matter how much shaking you do, when you finish up and walk out the bathroom, the last drops of pee come out and onto your pants. He concludes that Americans value triplet things privacy, masculinity, and cool. And infers that elimination patters are intimately linked with a cultures system of values. 5. I think that the significance of the work is trying to understand how people learn the etiquette of using the bathroom without formally being taught.In class we learned bout ethnography, which is the description of a culture through an observer. In the article, a man was discover males Pee. 6. I evaluate this work as an Interesting topic because many people would not think twice about the fact that there was so much that went Into public etiquette. If I were conducting this experiment I would have test subject stand at certain urinals and see which urinals random strangers would consistently use to get better and accurate Information. Anthropology By agrarian 2 October 2013 1. Orrin Elliot 1975 From Ruttier to Rummies A Contribution toward the Ethnography of Peeing.In Cultural Anthropology A Sampler. Up. Elliot Rings objectives for the article were to observe male urinating behaviors in public restrooms. I believe he did feel like watching people pee could make people uncomfortable, mad, or actually realizes is that during the act of peeing, one must look forward and keep theyre eyes article, a man was observing males Pee. 6. I evaluate this work as an interesting topic that went into public etiquette. If I were conducting this experiment I would have test consistently use to get better and accurate information.